#149887 - 03/09/06 04:16 PM
Introversion vs. Extroversion
|
CoS Member
Registered: 09/09/02
Posts: 1473
Loc: Chicago, IL USA
|
This topic came up in a recent discussion between TrojZyr and myself, and we figured we'd throw it open to the board and let it get kicked around.
Along the axis of introversion and extroversion, do Satanists tend to fall disproportionately on one side or the other? Or, to put it another way: is introversion more compatible with a Satanic personality than extroversion?
TrojZyr and I are both introverts, and we suspect that quite a few others here on the board are as well. But she and I are still at odds over the question of whether that's representative of Satanists as a whole, or an artifact of a selection bias (i.e. an Internet forum will tend to attract more thoughtful nerds than party animals.)
I can see both sides of the argument. As TrojZyr put it, "it's hard to be an extroverted misanthrope." But on the other hand, Dr. LaVey did speak of self-aware individuals occurring at all spots on the clock. So the question is if the disribution is more-or-less even, or if statistically we tend to skew to one side.
We actually arrived at this topic via a discussion of the Myers-Briggs, which makes a sharper introvert-extrovert distinction than does the LaVey Personality Synthesizer. (Mapping the MBTI onto the LPS is an interesting challenge all by itself, but it's somewhat beside the point here.)
Your thoughts? Introverts and Extroverts alike, speak up!
-Chess
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#149888 - 03/09/06 04:49 PM
Re: Introversion vs. Extroversion
[Re: Chess]
|
Registered: 01/27/06
Posts: 63
Loc: Midwest
|
If introversion is the idea of one who is preoccupied with ones own thoughts, needs and feelings, that I believe many of us are that way by default. But, like most things, it's much deeper than that.
If one feeling or concern you have is the happiness of someone else, and you strive to make that other person satisfied simply for your happiness, what would you call that?
_________________________
"I've found him, I have Jesus in the trunk." - George Carlin
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#149889 - 03/09/06 05:03 PM
Re: Introversion vs. Extroversion
[Re: Chess]
|
CoS Witch
Registered: 07/25/01
Posts: 12947
Loc: The Solid State
|
I just located a quick-n-dirty article that nicely illustrates the basics: http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200303/rauchKeep in mind, folks, that introversion is not shyness. Introverts can be quite outgoing, sociable, and socially adept---I'm quite outgoing, for example---but, after a while, socializing and/or partying drains their energy, so they need to retreat into a quieter or more solitary activity. Engaging conversation about interesting topics will give an introvert a temporary boost of energy, however, so not all forms of socializing are created equal. I'd tend to think that practically all Satanists would fundamentally be introverts, although some will inevitably be more or less introverted than others. Introverts care about big ideas, they don't get lonely easily, they don't cling to other people, they choose their company carefully, they're introspective, they're more self-aware, they often take longer to consider ideas more deeply, they enjoy and pursue hobbies that are either solitary or just require one or two other people, they don't like too much flash or excitement, etc. That sounds like many of the Satanists I know, at least. But, of course I'll tend to heap more praise on introverts, since I am one.
_________________________
"Gentlemen, the verdict is guilty, on all ten counts of first-degree stupidity. The penalty phase will now begin."--Divine, "Pink Flamingos."
"The strong rule the weak, and the cunning rule over all." HS!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#149890 - 03/09/06 05:58 PM
Hard ?
[Re: Chess]
|
CoS Warlock
Registered: 01/17/05
Posts: 2062
|
Quote:
"it's hard to be an extroverted misanthrope."
No, in my opinion. I explain :
I see the term "extroverted" when you have no problem to open yourself to people (of course) but letting the door too much openned.
My point is this one : you can deal with everyone. To speak with people considered as sheeps could be useful. At this moment they'll think you are extroverted, while you have something else in mind which won't be felt by others. This is an introverted way to be.
Now, let's don't speak about some so called extroverted people on the web, who couldn't handle a conversation with you in life, by looking into your eyes, and with the same intensity. Very easy to see this.
_________________________
Has left the board.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#149893 - 03/09/06 08:42 PM
Re: Introversion vs. Extroversion
[Re: Chess]
|
CoS Member
Registered: 01/20/06
Posts: 2331
Loc: East Coast, USA.
|
I think pigeonholing a Satanist is an exercise in futility. Does Satanism attract certain personality types? Sure. But I don't think a broad generalization is appropriate or effective. The introvert/extrovert argument is null and void; both are compatible with Satanism. Just an opinion of course.  As a side note: I scored an INTJ on the Myers-Briggs test; 78% introvert. I'd never heard of the test until you mentioned it in this thread. The explanation that came with my score was fairly accurate. Go figure. 
Edited by AmbientLogic (03/09/06 08:50 PM)
_________________________
"People who harbor strong convictions without evidence belong at the margins of our societies, not in our halls of power. The only thing we should respect in a person’s faith is his desire for a better life in this world; we need never have respected his certainty that one awaits him in the next."
- Sam Harris
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#149894 - 03/09/06 10:16 PM
Re: Introversion vs. Extroversion
[Re: Poetaster]
|
CoS Warlock
Registered: 01/17/05
Posts: 2062
|
Quote:
The introvert/extrovert argument is null and void; both are compatible with Satanism.
Yes, it surely is.
This kind of subject makes me remember Kant in one essay he had written, classifying people...That was like " N°1 is blah blah blah, while N°2 is more blah blah..."
We are talking about individualism here, not CLONES !
_________________________
Has left the board.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#149895 - 03/09/06 11:36 PM
Re: Introversion vs. Extroversion
[Re: Assabrah]
|
CoS Member
Registered: 09/09/02
Posts: 1473
Loc: Chicago, IL USA
|
Quote:
This kind of subject makes me remember Kant in one essay he had written, classifying people...That was like " N°1 is blah blah blah, while N°2 is more blah blah..."
Or Dr. LaVey in The Satanic Witch? The twelve o'clock man has certain traits...
These sorts of measurements (particularly the psychological ones) are often misapplied, of course, but they do have their uses.
Quote:
We are talking about individualism here, not CLONES !
And that's just the sort of misapplication I'm talking about.
I have a Myers-Briggs rating (INTP in this case). I also have a blood type. And a body mass index. And an IQ. And about three zillion other metrics that measure some part of me and then drop me into a category. Now, those categories may apply to me, but not one of them (nor even the whole assortment of them put together) defines me.
So I'm not afraid to be in a category. I know there's plenty more to me than just what's in there. Plus it can provide useful information... or even point up an apparent correlation that inspires a discussion thread. 
-Chess
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#149896 - 03/10/06 05:27 AM
Re: Introversion vs. Extroversion
[Re: Chess]
|
CoS Member
Registered: 08/25/02
Posts: 1780
Loc: Michigan, USA
|
Honestly, it depends upon what suits me.
I do enjoy plenty of social situations, even if some people are included who I would exclude if I could. I enjoy performing in different aspects, from telling a good joke amongst newly met strangers on up to doing something on a stage.
At the same time, I'm not always likely to talk to people first, but rather, end up being the person approached. I don't always tell everything I know about a subject if it comes up in conversation, even if I'm very familiar and have more knowledge on it than those discussing it. I have artwork I don't feel the need to show others.
I would expect many Satanists to feel this way, not being really one or the other, but that isn't to say all Satanists will feel this way.
_________________________
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." -Carl Sagan
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#149899 - 03/10/06 07:57 AM
Re: Introversion vs. Extroversion
[Re: Chess]
|
Banned
Registered: 02/05/04
Posts: 2241
|
Quote:
I can see both sides of the argument. As TrojZyr put it, "it's hard to be an extroverted misanthrope." But on the other hand, Dr. LaVey did speak of self-aware individuals occurring at all spots on the clock. So the question is if the disribution is more-or-less even, or if statistically we tend to skew to one side.
Well, I think that to sum it to "it's hard to be an extroverted misanthrope" is a little too black & white. There can be several shades to it, in reality.
I for instance, when in a situation I have to be around sheep for whatever interest that I may have at the time, will talk to them about the Big Brother Brazil and make it sound like I´m really interested. That may make it seem I am an extrovert type, often times people will tell me that I´m so friendly, nothing like I "portray to be online."
On the other hand, those with a little brain, can perceive that in these situations, I´m not at all talking about myself to a personal level, what I´m doing is merely entertaining the sheep as a means to an end. Furthermore, if I wasn´t obligated so to speak, to entertain them, as for instance if these same sheep I had to talk to about the Big Brother Brazil and sound really interested at a determined event were to bump into me whilst having a private night out, or just anywhere in a obligation-free scenario, they´d have a completely different picture of me, plus I´d never bring them to my lair, as opposed to how they like to believe I would. So in short, no, I´m not keen on people at all, but I´ll have them believe that I truly am, if the situation would require me to do so.
HS!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#149900 - 03/10/06 08:37 AM
Re: Introversion vs. Extroversion
[Re: TrojZyr]
|
CoS Member
Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 581
Loc: Brighton, England
|
I found the article interesting as I could see myself in it quite strongly! I've always thought of myself more as a loner than an introvert, but at the end of the day they're both just labels!
I do spend a lot of my free time alone, and if I go to the cinema, or a concert, unless I'm going with my son I tend to go on my own, which others sometimes find a bit strange but doesn't bother me. I do tend to find being around others, with a few notable exceptions, tiring, but enjoy social intercourse in small doses - I would find spending a lot of time round others would drive me crazy (or homicidal!).
I have noticed that a lot of people find these traits a bit weird or antisocial, but that's their problem! Interestingly when I was younger I used to see my 'need' to be separate from the 'social whirl' as a negative thing, but as I've got older I now see it as one of my strongest characteristics!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#149901 - 03/10/06 10:21 AM
Re: Introversion vs. Extroversion
[Re: TrojZyr]
|
Registered: 09/27/05
Posts: 49
|
Quote:
I just located a quick-n-dirty article that nicely illustrates the basics:
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200303/rauch
A couple of points in that article were of especial personal resonance:
Quote:
[...] when you see an introvert lost in thought, don't say "What's the matter?" or "Are you all right?"
When I was young fella, a frequent issue with the familial critters is that they often 'knew' I was "upset about something" but was "refusing to tell them what." Invariably, what set them off was me merely sitting and thinking quietly. Much interrogational goose-chasing would often follow, which would get me upset, which is then taken as proof that I was really upset to begin with.
Attempts to directly clarify that situation met with little success:
"What are you upset about?" "I'm thinking. " "Well you shouldn't think so much if it gets you upset."
Quote:
Female introverts, I suspect, must suffer especially. In certain circles, particularly in the Midwest, a man can still sometimes get away with being what they used to call a strong and silent type;
It is interesting to me, that introverted traits can, in a male, be seen as some highly-masculine type. I've had several occasions when somebody's described/accused me of "acting tough/macho" when all I'm doing, again, is just being thoughty and mum. This is a bit of a problem in situations were you have to be a team-player, appearing to like everyone, etc. But when I'm out and about in the homo underground, I happily use these for-free macho points the better to attract those I want to attract, and to alienate/pain those I want to alienate/pain.
"Oh, you have to act all macho." "I was doing nothing. I'm sorry if doing nothing isn't faggy enough for you." *cold_catlike_stare*
I practically landed my last boyfriend just by doing this sort of thing.
--LightSnake
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|