Well at the very least they give you an opportunity to share your "insights", so be gracious.
And by the way, anyone who calls themself a "Satanist" is in some form, to a lesser or greater degree, "emulateing" Lavey. Whether in the form of sharing a similar wordview, philosophy, aesthetic taste etc... or maybe just the same catch-phrase...
And anyway I said "did he" not "who did he" or"why did he"/"why didn't he" and had no intention of turning it into a discussion about that. I only wanted to better define my understanding of the "satanic philosophy" by inquireing of the original "Satanist" from those who knew him personally.
I got an answer, and apon reflection I got what I wanted, "end" "of" "sto""ry".
Don't bother replying to this, I won't respond.
I've already wasted too much time on this, and if it wasn't for the replies attached to my original post, it would have already been deleted by now