#30579 - 03/09/04 10:13 AM
A rose by any other name?
|
CoS Member
Registered: 02/28/04
Posts: 44
|
I always wonder when I see Satanists refrain from using certain words. For example, I often see the word "xtian" instead of "christian". I wonder why some do this, are they too lazy to type the entire word? Are they afraid to use the word, for one reason or another?
(Niether of those traits are very Satanic in my opinion)
No mythologic name or image holds any sort of reverence for me (except in the ritual chamber, and then it's a conscious choice....I could even choose to use my own name if the fancy struck me)
On one site, I even saw the word "xtoid", now even fully spelled out "christoid", this makes no sense to me whatsoever. Is this another created word like "wiccan" that someone is trying to introduce to an already intellectually lacking society and it's pollitically corect vocabulary?
Why should we, as Satanist, worry about possibly offending christians, or especially othr Satanists by using the word "christian"?
Edited by DavidP (03/09/04 10:24 AM)
_________________________
"I have examined all the known superstitions of the word, and I do not find in our particular superstition of christianity one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology. Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned. What has been the effect of this coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites."---Thomas Jefferson
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30581 - 03/09/04 10:23 AM
Re: A rose by any other name?
[Re: Mr_Scary]
|
CoS Member
Registered: 02/28/04
Posts: 44
|
My mistake...I have been awake for 27 hours, just came off a long nights work and wanted to get the stuff down before i went to bed.
_________________________
"I have examined all the known superstitions of the word, and I do not find in our particular superstition of christianity one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology. Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned. What has been the effect of this coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites."---Thomas Jefferson
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30582 - 03/09/04 11:00 AM
Re: A rose by any other name?
[Re: DavidP]
|
Registered: 08/31/03
Posts: 607
Loc: Michigan
|
How is being lazy "un-Satanic" when Sloth is one of the 7 virtues by which one should enjoy life?
_________________________
There is no Hank. You are Karl. Make your own list as you see fit. Eat as many wieners as you want, any way you want, even with a large group of consenting individuals if you want! Take pride in your wiener-eating. Make up large, elaborate ceremonies revolving around the kissing of your own ass, having them photographed and videotaped by the media if possible.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30583 - 03/09/04 11:06 AM
Re: A rose by any other name?
[Re: RobertE]
|
CoS Member
Registered: 02/28/04
Posts: 44
|
Lazy can equal stupid when the material to learn has been around since 1968, and the person doesn't take the time to read about what they are pretending to be.
_________________________
"I have examined all the known superstitions of the word, and I do not find in our particular superstition of christianity one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology. Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned. What has been the effect of this coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites."---Thomas Jefferson
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30584 - 03/09/04 11:22 AM
Re: A rose by any other name?
[Re: DavidP]
|
CoS Reverend
Registered: 06/25/02
Posts: 10476
Loc: England
|
>>material to learn has been around since 1968<<
Why? What exactly happened in 1968 then, Mr DavidP?
I mean apart from "2001 - A Space Odyssey" and the assassinations of Martin Luther and Robert Kennedy.
What is it specifically that happened in this year are you refering to?
_________________________
"u.v.ray is an uncompromising writer who glares at the world with bloodshot eyes. He gazes into the abyss and sees jewels of tragedy, comedy, cruelty, heroism, tenderness, darkness, grit and futility. We Are Glass is a searing collection of seventeen razor-sharp short stories; a very fine collection indeed." -- Paul D. Brazill. www.uvray.moonfruit.com
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30585 - 03/09/04 11:29 AM
Re: A rose by any other name?
[Re: DavidP]
|
Registered: 08/22/03
Posts: 1223
|
Quote:
Why should we, as Satanist, worry about possibly offending christians, or especially othr Satanists by using the word "christian"?
I don't think some type Christian as Xtian because they are "afraid of possibly offending" anyone. I think most mean it as a blatant offense. One way to see it is that there is a big bold X (as in crossing something out} there. I personally just type Christian. I have been known to type XXXmas, however, as that gives a clearer description of how I approach said holiday.. 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30586 - 03/09/04 11:30 AM
The Most Important Event in History!!!
[Re: Drake_Bamboozle]
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Mr. Mullah, He must be referring to my birth in the year 1968!!! I must be his idol. 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30587 - 03/09/04 11:35 AM
Re: A rose by any other name?
[Re: DavidP]
|
Registered: 08/22/03
Posts: 1223
|
Quote:
Lazy can equal stupid..
By using can, you will surely agree that this is but one interpretation.
What I think RobertE means is that the so-called Seven Deadly Sins are more of a checks and balances for the Satanist.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30588 - 03/09/04 11:55 AM
Re: A rose by any other name?
[Re: Drake_Bamboozle]
|
CoS Member
Registered: 02/28/04
Posts: 44
|
okay....1969.
My point still stands.
_________________________
"I have examined all the known superstitions of the word, and I do not find in our particular superstition of christianity one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology. Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned. What has been the effect of this coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites."---Thomas Jefferson
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30589 - 03/09/04 11:56 AM
Re: A rose by any other name?
[Re: DavidP]
|
Registered: 08/22/03
Posts: 1223
|
Quote:
My point still stands.
How?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30590 - 03/09/04 12:03 PM
Re: A rose by any other name?
[Re: DavidP]
|
Registered: 11/27/02
Posts: 3954
Loc: The Deep South
|
That's just a mater of personal tastes. I don't like to use that kind of abbreviations, because I like to call things by their names. I always spell Christian, Christmas... I must also say this way to speak is not unique of Satanists (or even pseudo-Satanists) Christians themselves use the abbreviated form "Marry Xmas" in greeting cards and they don't intend it as offensive. Also, the most important event that happened in 1968, besides the ones mentioned above, was my arrival to this planet. 
_________________________
You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having both at once. Robert A. Heinlein
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30592 - 03/09/04 12:34 PM
Re: A rose by any other name?
[Re: DavidP]
|
CoS Warlock
Registered: 08/25/03
Posts: 6795
Loc: Forever West
|
Some people have a sense of humor.
_________________________
"I've learned . . . that life is like a roll of toilet paper. The closer it gets to the end, the faster it goes." ~Andy Rooney
"At last I shall have time to devote myself seriously and freely to the destruction of all my former opinions." ~Descartes
“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself—and you are the easiest person to fool.” ~Richard Feynman
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30594 - 03/09/04 12:51 PM
Re: The pope says...
[Re: Shiboleth]
|
CoS Member
Registered: 02/28/04
Posts: 44
|
What's funny is if you ever look at conspiracy sites on the web, some think the pope is the anti-christ
_________________________
"I have examined all the known superstitions of the word, and I do not find in our particular superstition of christianity one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology. Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned. What has been the effect of this coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites."---Thomas Jefferson
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30595 - 03/09/04 12:54 PM
Re: A rose by any other name?
[Re: Discipline]
|
CoS Member
Registered: 02/28/04
Posts: 44
|
"I got a sense of Humor, I gotta Hell of a sense of humor." -Sgt Hulka (Stripes)
_________________________
"I have examined all the known superstitions of the word, and I do not find in our particular superstition of christianity one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology. Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned. What has been the effect of this coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites."---Thomas Jefferson
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30596 - 03/09/04 01:01 PM
Re: The pope says...
[Re: DavidP]
|
Registered: 01/06/04
Posts: 113
Loc: Alberta, Canada
|
(ex Catholic here) the reason for that I suspect is that according to Roman Catholic doctrine, the pope is Jesus' direct represtentative on Earth, that chaffes many Protestant and Baptist/Pentecostal sects. Most of these sects do not regard Catholics as Christians anyhow due to their high respect for Mary. In my home province, Newfoundland, Mary is almost equal to God in that she's regarded as the Queen of Heaven. Prayers go to her before Jesus or God for that matter. Its an interesting throwback to Goddess worship and coresponds directly to Nuit or Nut in Thelemic doctrine. Neat huh?
Edited by Shiboleth (03/09/04 01:02 PM)
_________________________
this is a recording...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30597 - 03/09/04 01:11 PM
Re: The pope says...
[Re: Shiboleth]
|
CoS Member
Registered: 02/28/04
Posts: 44
|
Very! Thanks for the post..very informative, and did not rub me the wrong way...very little chaf'ing...unlike my posts so it seems. 
_________________________
"I have examined all the known superstitions of the word, and I do not find in our particular superstition of christianity one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology. Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned. What has been the effect of this coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites."---Thomas Jefferson
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30598 - 03/09/04 01:46 PM
Why "X" isn't inherantly offensive
[Re: Shiboleth]
|
CoS Reverend
Registered: 07/28/01
Posts: 11183
Loc: New England, USA
|
>X corresponds with the Greek letter kristos if I'm not >mistaken it therefore fits.
Actually, you're confusing the word with the first letter of that word. Cristos ("Kristos") is the Greek WORD for "Christ". The first letter of that word is called chi, which looks like an "X".
The use of "X" to stand for "Christ" was developed by Xtians centuries ago, and they continue to use it. Some sects use the first two letters, chi and rho (which looks like a "P"). That's why you'll see a lot of Catholic churches displaying what looks like an "X" drawn over a "P".
I use words like "Xtian" or "Xtianity" for one simple reason: it's short-hand. And it's a habit I got into from years of posting to religion-themed forums. If people take offense to that, then they're obviously ignorant of the subject and I'd say they thus deserve to be offended.
Besides, since the original New Testament was in Greek, wouldn't it be less offensive to use the first initial of the original name, rather than the name "Jesus"? "Jesus" doesn't even mention the "Christ" (divinity) part, but is itself just a translation of a translation of a translation. I've seen coffe mugs with my so-called "Hawaiian name" on them, but calling me "B" seems closer to the truth than using some foreign translation of my name.
>Another thing Satanists think is Satanic is really >Christian or Xian is the inverted cross. St. Peter didn't >want to be crucified right side up or so the story goes >because he felt it would be an affront to Jesus.
Yes, in fact many sources call this "the Cross of St. Peter". That would be fun to say the next time I see somebody wearing and inverted cross. "Hey, the cross of St. Peter! Are you Catholic?"
_________________________
Reverend Bill M. http://www.devilsmischief.com: Carnal Comedy Clips, Netherworld Novelty Numbers, New hour every week. Download the mp3 now! http://www.aplaceformystuff.org: Tales of Combat Clutter and other Adventures (Wenn du Google's Übersetzer verwendest, um diese Worte zu lesen, dann bist du ein Arschloch.)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30599 - 03/09/04 02:26 PM
Re: Why "X" isn't inherantly offensive
[Re: Bill_M]
|
Registered: 01/06/04
Posts: 113
Loc: Alberta, Canada
|
ah I stand corrected, thank you. "That would be fun to say the next time I see somebody wearing and inverted cross. "Hey, the cross of St. Peter! Are you Catholic?" " I've done that, the motherfucker got pissed and started ranting "you christians this and that" how little he knew. 
_________________________
this is a recording...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30600 - 03/09/04 02:29 PM
Re: Why "X" isn't inherantly offensive
[Re: Bill_M]
|
CoS Member
Registered: 01/29/04
Posts: 396
Loc: Hungary
|
Quote:
Yes, in fact many sources call this "the Cross of St. Peter". That would be fun to say the next time I see somebody wearing and inverted cross. "Hey, the cross of St. Peter! Are you Catholic?"
Caravaggio, who lived around the 1600s, painted "The Crucifiction of St. Peter".
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30601 - 03/09/04 03:10 PM
Re: A rose by any other name?
[Re: DavidP]
|
CoS Member
Registered: 07/03/02
Posts: 777
Loc: San Diego, CA
|
I think you are a little confused.
The "X" in the Xtian spelling is the crossing out of Christ.
"Xtoid" (though I never use the term myself) would be similar in meaning as mongaloid.
Why should we, as Satanist, worry about possibly offending christians, or especially othr Satanists by using the word "christian"?
I think these terms are used in the name of bieng offensive, rather than a fear of offending.
In short, those who do use these terms and spellings do so for the sake of fun...and I see nothing wrong with that at all.

Edited by C_D_McKinna (03/09/04 04:18 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30602 - 03/09/04 03:41 PM
Re: A rose by any other name?
[Re: C_D_McKinna]
|
CoS Reverend
Registered: 06/03/02
Posts: 4136
Loc: Oregon
|
Quote:
In short, those who do thse terms and spellings do so for the sake of fun...and I see nothing wrong with that at all.
I think this depends on the person. Magister Nemo made a few posts a while back about calling a group what they prefer to be called. It was in reference to calling CoS members "pinkies" - but it applies here as well.
I, personally, think that by spelling the name out, just as you would for the name of any other religion, you put it in a completely neutral position. It equalizes. I don't see people abbreviating the name of any other religion frequently, and yes - much in the way that not capitalizing the word "I" may denote a certain kind of insecurity or self depreciation - Xian (etc.) can denote that the user feels threatened by Christianity and feels the need to undermine it in some way. "Christ" is a powerful word for a lot of people in the world. To pretend that, in effect (if not by intent), "X"ing it out is not making a small negative statement about your feelings toward that powerful word and the idea that it represents seems somewhat naive.
With regards to communication, it is not so much what you mean that matters - it's what you say.
I know many people here do simply use this as an abbreviation. And I am not implying that they necessarily feel 'threatened' or 'insecure' about the use of the word Christ. However, no doubt, some do. And that is, like it or not, how it reads to an outsider. Mr. Padgett simply picked this up and mentioned it.
There's no harm in doing it, and I don't think less of other Satanists for doing so.
But this is not the last time this question will be asked. There is a reason why people think this way - no matter what the intent of the author. It will read, to a majority of the population, like you are avoiding using the word Christ, or trying to undermine Christians in some way via language.
Christians undermine themselves, when forced to hold a discussion within a rational framework. This is, I think, much more satisfying. 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#30604 - 03/09/04 04:28 PM
Re: A rose by any other name?
[Re: Rev_Malebranche]
|
CoS Member
Registered: 07/03/02
Posts: 777
Loc: San Diego, CA
|
Quote:
In short, those who do thse terms and spellings do so for the sake of fun...and I see nothing wrong with that at all.
That was an interesting contraction of the words "use" and "these," don't you think? 
On a more serious note, your post was very well stated, and you made some excellent points.
I do think that the "X" has it's place. Much like the Black Mass and the Infernal Diatribe, treating the terms Christ and Christian in a deragoatory manner can be liberating.
People have good reason to be angry with the Christian Church after all, and the releasing of such pent up anger, even in seemingly insignificant gestures as crossing out the Mad Redeemers name, can help one to move on to bigger and better things.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|