What do you know about the people who's presentations you are ready to call evidence?
So if the evidence
doesn't fit your
view of what is possible then it must be a hoax
We are to assume there is a gargantuan conspiracy when hundreds of scientists and engineers continue to find, produce and publish positive evidence for over more than one hundred years?
would make precognition easy to accept by comparison.
With that supposition you can ignore anything
you dislike no matter who suggests it or how much evidence is offered.
The last time I ran into that approach was from a Christian door-to-door evangelist.
It was pointless to discuss things with him (he could explain away anything
) and I can see that it is also pointless to discuss them with you.
So it's happy trails to you, pardner.
Others may be interested in further discussions with you if they wish, but I always close the door on evangelists who consistently pull this nonsense, and I now close my personal door on you as well for exactly the same reason.
(Now where is that "ignore this user" button anyway?).