In my opinion, I think it should be established that responsibility for the personal behavior of a member of the
Church of Satan, or by one who agrees with our principles, rests solely on the shoulders of that particular individual. It is important to determine what is appropriate for the given environment, and to utilize one's own wisdom to gain the most satisfying experience. Our philosophy demands self-determination and personal responsibility.
It should be noted that Satanists practice the principle of reciprocation, and adhere to the adage: "
When walking in open territory, bother no-one. If someone bothers you, ask him to stop, If he does not stop, destroy him."(11th Satanic Rule of The Earth, Anton Szandor LaVey). We are law-abiding, and will pursue justice through whatever rational and legal means that are available. This "destruction" - a dramatic way to frame the idea of victory over the assailant - may be achieved through self-defense either verbally, through ritual psychodrama and symbolism, and even via legally appropriate physical force, until a sense of justice is attained. Justice for the Satanist is based on the principle that the punishment should fit in kind and degree the crime - Lex Talionis.
If someone attacks an individual based upon a 'hatred' of their religion, then all legal means necessary should be taken to punish the perpetrator, regardless of which particular religion is involved. State retribution should be swift for any unwarranted attack, but now, since there is specification for so-called "hate crimes", a Satanist should take advantage of this option as well. I think the obvious reason why this case is garnering so much attention is because of the professed philosophy of Mr. Romano. It seems to be a first in legal history.
Overall, the incident seems to fit the definition of a "hate crime," even though the defense attorney would seek to put a spin on it so as to not have his clients face such a charge, which would carry a heavier sentence. Was it determined whether the thugs were members of a Christian church? Imagine that - then it may be considered a "Christian crime".
Such events just go to show the types which are attracted to that form of belief system, who might use it as a convenient excuse for aberrant behavior. I am sure these cretins will meet with due punishment, via the legal system as well as the ritual chamber, and being that they so richly deserve it, I am sure Mr. Romano will channel his rage to achieve satisfying and justified vengeance.
However, Satanists think it important to be aware of one's environment, and adapt accordingly in order to avoid unnecessary negative interaction. If one chooses to dress in an overtly theatrical manner, one should be prepared for possible reactions from the herd and be prepared to defend one's position if need be. Donning an inverted cross in a largely Catholic neighborhood is probably not using one's best judgment, especially if you understand that there might be some aggressive Christian bullies about.
With very few worthy exceptions, Satanists tend to avoid ostentatious types, simply because such a display is considered to be pretentious. Unless theindividual is some sort of performance artist on stage, it would appear rather inappropriate, irrelevant, and even ridiculous, giving outsiders theimpression that members of the
Church of Satan are just involved for shock value. The axiom, "There is a time and place for everything" applies here.
_______________
* {Posted with permission from Magistra Nadramia}.
Previous Topic
Index
